Sent: Wednesday 11 November 2020 22:35
To: John Weigel <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: [EMF Updates]
Bernays used Freud’s work on the unconscious as a means to tap into people’s inner desires or fears to influence the public. He was able to make people believe that certain products will fulfill their desires, give them happiness and keep them docile and manageable. He also used these same tactics to influence public opinion in politics.
The global takeover is underway
Hacking the planet: The climate engineering reality
In the mid 1940’s global powers made the decision to intervene in Earth’s climate and life support systems without the knowledge or consent of populations. The weather makers tell us their programs are a form of mitigation for global warming, but is this the truth? Is climate engineering / solar radiation management helping to cool the planet? Or are the ongoing geoengineering operations only temporarily cooling some regions at the cost of further fueling the overall rapid unraveling of Earth’s climate and life support systems? What other covert agendas are being carried out? How dangerous is the highly toxic heavy metal fallout from these programs that is raining down through our breathable air column? “Hacking The Planet: The Climate Engineering Reality” is a condensed hard hitting 40+ minute climate engineering educational documentary. This informational video reveals shocking film footage of the ongoing atmospheric spraying operations in addition to covering the most fundamental facts about the covert global geoengineering / climate intervention programs.
SAE International publishes two new documents enabling commercialization of wireless charging for electric vehicles
Standards Support EV Industry’s Growth to Allow Wireless Technology to Help Accelerate the Adoption of Zero Emission Vehicles
WARRENDALE, Pa. (October 22, 2020) – SAE International announced today the publishing of two new documents to enable electric vehicles (EVs) a safe and efficient method for transferring power from a charging station to the vehicle.
- SAE J2954™ Standard: “Wireless Power Transfer & Alignment for Light Duty Vehicles”
- SAE J2847/6™ Recommended Practice: “Communication for Wireless Power Transfer between Light-Duty Plug-in Electric Vehicles and Wireless EV Charging Stations”
“The publication of these two groundbreaking SAE Wireless Charging and Communications documents, SAE J2954 and SAE J2847/6, are the result of countless hours of work from SAE taskforces and industry to offer confidence in the safety and interoperability of these technologies as we approach commercialization,” said Jack Pokrzywa, Director of Global Ground Vehicle Standards, SAE International. “We are grateful for all of the significant contributions from technology providers, automotive industry manufacturers, government agencies and regulatory bodies that enabled the successful establishment of the standard.”
From André Fauteux, editor / publisher, La Maison du 21e siècle magazine
New IEEE paper questions safety of exposure to 5G cell phone radiation
Most of the attention has focused on the cell towers or base stations; however, the safety of using 5G cell phones and other 5G personal devices may be an even greater concern due to the proximity of these devices to our bodies.
CV-19 – 5G connectivity
largest global coverup in history
Part 1 – 5G Revelation – How 60 Ghz Changes The
Electron Spin Of O2 And Blocks Your Hemoglobin
From Absorbing Oxygen And Feeding Your Body
Part 2 – 5G And The Great 60 Ghz Hoax
Part 3 – Electric Virology – Viruses Are Simply
Excretions Of A Toxic Cell
Part 4 – UN Agenda 21, Agenda 2030 – The NWO
Part 5 – The New World Order – Covid 19 Is Not True
It Prevents As High Altitude Severe Oxygen Deprivation
How 5G Causes Cell Poisoning And Toxicity
Dr. Christiane Northrup claims vaccines will turn people into antennae
Note: Video removed.
From Arthur Firstenberg, author, ‘The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life’
OUTREACH TO ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
Below is a link to a template for a letter that I am sending to the Sierra Club, Audubon Society, Greenpeace, and hundreds of other environmental organizations.
Please write to organizations that you are connected with in your country. Compose your own letter, or feel free to use what I have drafted. Please send me copies of any favorable responses you receive. Contact me if you wish to work with me in this endeavor.
Please forward this newsletter widely. To send via social media, use this link:
P.O. Box 6216
Santa Fe, NM 87502
phone: +1 505-471-0129
From Uplift, Ireland
Bees are dying
Here’s three interesting facts you might not know:
- Bees are dying at a rate which is putting them at risk of extinction. 
- Over the last few decades, 97% of wildflower meadows have disappeared. 
- Bees play a vital role in our global food supply, pollinating crops which feed 90% of the world’s population. 
All of this spells bad news for our bees – and for the food we need.  But as Uplift members we don’t just sit back and let bad things happen.
That’s why thousands of us up and down the country will sign up to get bee-friendly seeds to plant next spring, just like we did last year. We’ll make a massive difference – giving our bees enough food to survive and thrive.
Apple announces four iPhone 12 models, all with 5G capability
BT inks deal with Ericsson to replace Huawei in UK’s 5G mobile communications network
Carriers around the world started switching on their 5G networks last year, promising super fast data speeds and smoother gaming and streaming experiences. But the global rollout of 5G has so far been marred by gaps in coverage. It’s expected to gather pace though with the recent launch of Apple’s iPhone 12.
Google reveals mineral crop-inspecting robots
Google’s parent company, Alphabet, has unveiled prototype robots that can inspect individual plants in a field, to help farmers improve crop yields.
The robot buggies roll through fields on upright pillars, so they can coast over plants without disturbing them.
The goal is to collect huge amounts of data about how crops grow.
Called Project Mineral, it is part of Alphabet’s X company, which aims to create world-changing technology from radical “moonshot” ideas.
5G – Bias and conflict of interest at the BBC
Since the start of the Covid-19 crisis, in addition to a host of reports on the subject in its news and current affairs programmes, the BBC has run a few stand-alone radio and TV documentaries on what it refers to as “5G conspiracy theories”. In April, there was an Inquiry radio episode called “Why are people attacking mobile phone masts?” In June an episode of File on Four was titled “The 5G con that could make you sick”, while a 25-minute documentary broadcast on BBC1 in early July was called Viral: the 5G conspiracy theory.
Uncle of children sick from Verizon 5G tower next to home fights to prevent it happening to other families
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — As the march to install superfast 5G wireless service continues across the country, advocates for patients with electro-sensitivity are questioning the technology’s safety.
Noah Davidson of Sacramento began lobbying to have 5G antennas moved away from people’s homes and offices because his five- and seven-year-old nieces got sick for two months straight, right after Verizon installed a 5G box on a light pole next to their home.
Is the Earth striking back?
That is just insane! 2.24 million lightning strikes in just 48 hours hit the eastern states of Australia
Australia has been hit by more than 2.24 million lightning strikes in just 48 hours as wild weather battered the east coast over the weekend.
Storms and damaging winds up to 100km/h wreaked havoc in multiple states, with volunteers responding to hundreds of calls for help.
HUGE DISCOVERY! Earthquakes striking next to high voltage power lines across WHOLE USA
From Prof. Olle Johansson, Sweden
Letter to the United Nations
WHO office at the UN: email@example.com WHO office at the EU: firstname.lastname@example.org
WHO Center for Health Development: email@example.com
WHO Global Service Centre (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia): firstname.lastname@example.org WHO Regional Office for Africa: email@example.com
Council on Human Rights: firstname.lastname@example.org
WHO Liaison Office to the African Union and Economic Commission for Africa: email@example.com
to: His Excellency António Guterres, His Excellency Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, and Other Esteemed UN and WHO Officials:
The subject of my letter: The serious truth about wireless 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G needs to be urgently heeded – before the rollout of 5G results in an increase in the permitted levels of electromagnetic microwave radiation across the planet.
My name is Olle Johansson, and I am an associate professor, retired from the world-famous Karolinska Institute and the equally famous Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, both with their close associations to the Nobel Prizes in Physiology or Medicine, Chemistry and Physics, and I am submitting this testimony because I understand that you at present might be concerned about the fast deployment of 5G wireless systems both internationally as well as locally, without adequate sharing of information with the public.
I have been contacted before by many, many residents of our beautiful countries around the planet in connection with the installation of smart meters, proposed cell tower installations,
wireless systems near and in schools, hospitals, residential areas, health effects of wireless baby alarms, tablets, and DECT phones, and more. The letters I have received can not be overlooked or disregarded.
You may also be aware that I have recently (November 5, 2019) presented my views at the Italian Parliament at a meeting organized by Mr. Maurizio Martucci, Mr. Giorgio Cinciripini, and others; and so I have done several times before; had it not been for the coronavirus/COVID-19 worldwide lockdown I would have visited many countries around the planet already this last Winter, Spring, Summer, and now Autumn.
For many years I have been studying the health effects of wireless gadgets, such as cell phones, WIFi, and similar. My research decades ago was instrumental to determine the old CRT computer monitors were biologically harmful and that’s why we switched them out for the less impactful flat-screen monitors. I also played a similar role in the protection of pregnant women in front of computers. I would point out that children, generally speaking, are more vulnerable to these kinds of radiation exposures.
Wireless communication is now being implemented in our daily life in a very fast way. At the same time, it is becoming more and more obvious that exposure to electromagnetic fields may result in highly unwanted health effects. This has been demonstrated in a very large number of studies and includes cellular DNA-damage (which may lead to the initiation of cancer as well as mutations that carry down generations), disruptions and alterations of cellular
functions like increases in intracellular stimulatory pathways and calcium handling, disruption of tissue structures like the blood-brain barrier (which may allow toxins to enter the brain), impact on the vessel and immune functions, and loss of fertility. It should be noted that we are not the only species in jeopardy, practically all animals, plants, and bacteria may be at stake. For the latter, Taheri et al (2017) have demonstrated that the exposure to 900 MHz GSM mobile phone radiation and 2.4 GHz radiofrequency radiation emitted from common Wi-Fi routers made Listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli resistant to different antibiotics. To say this finding is “scary” is a classical English understatement.
Because the effects are reproducibly observed and links to pathology can not be excluded, the Precautionary Principle should be in force in the implementation of this new technology within the society. Therefore, policymakers immediately should strictly control exposure by defining biologically-based maximal exposure guidelines also taking into account long-term, non-thermal effects, and including especially vulnerable groups, such as the elderly, the ill, the genetically and/or immunologically challenged, children and foetuses, and persons with the functional impairment electrohypersensitivity (which in Sweden is a fully recognized functional impairment, and therefore receives an annual governmental disability subsidy).
So, in essence, science is providing ever more convincing evidence that the radiation emitted by our wireless telecommunications systems can affect biological systems including humans and wildlife. These biological effects are acting even at very low exposure levels.
The consequences on health and environment can be all the more serious because:
– exposure is ubiquitous, repeated and/or prolonged,
– radiation from wireless technologies is modulated, pulsed, polarized,
– some individuals may be more vulnerable (foetuses, children, sick patients,…), and/or the effects being much more prolonged (foetuses, children),
– exposure is combined with other pollutants (e.g. chemical pollutants).
Damages on health and environment are already noticeable at exposure levels similar to those that are currently met across the planet.
It is clearly not enough just to ensure exposure levels are below WHO recommended levels. WHO recommendations are designed to protect cells from excessive temperature increase successive to a maximal 30 minutes exposure to radiofrequency/microwave radiations. The bases for these recommendations were established in the late 1990s and have not been revised since then, even though:
– wireless technologies have developed very rapidly over the past 20 years,
– exposure pattern has completely changed (ubiquitous, repeated, prolonged exposure, exposure of children, foetuses, etc.)
– considerable scientific progress has been made in the identification of biological and health effects.
Not everyone agrees on the question of absolute proof of damage because a certain number of unknowns remain, even at the scientific level. But there is no point using the fact that not all the grey areas have yet been dispelled to assert that there would be no health and environmental effects caused by the widespread deployment of wireless devices and networks.
To date, we can no longer deny that thousands and thousands of studies indicate very real effects. The unbridled development of wireless systems is, in the more or less short term, conflicting with the health and protection of ecosystems. Observations and return on experience indicate that damages are already in action.
I would like to remind you that, in 2011, the World Health Organization classified the radiofrequency and microwave emissions of wireless technologies as possible carcinogens. However, cancer is only one of the long-term consequences of prolonged exposure. Radiofrequency radiation affects our cells long before cancer develops. Our body reacts with oxidative stress and inflammatory processes. When the exposure is repeated or prolonged, these mechanisms are maintained and may cause sleep disorders, disturbances in cognitive and reproductive functions, damage to cells and DNA. In the long run, the body’s defense systems are being exhausted and diseases are threatening:
– repeated infections,
– developmental disorders (e. g. embryonic),
– neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders,
– cardiovascular diseases,
– neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s disease, – cancers.
Foetuses, children, are particularly affected because they may be more vulnerable, and/or the effects being much more prolonged. Also, they form the only basis for the future of mankind.
Every generation of wireless technology also swells the ranks of electrohypersensitive people who physically suffer from being exposed to electromagnetic radiation, whether or not they are aware of their electrohypersensitivity. Nocebo or psychological explanations are clearly not sufficient to explain the phenomenon.
Deploying 5G in addition to existing technologies, for sure, will increase the exposure of the world’s population. But beyond the additional layer of electromagnetic pollution, it will constitute, there is a strong suspicion that 5G, because of its technological specificities (frequencies, modulations, pulsations, narrowly focused and directional beams, densification of the antenna networks), will present even more serious health and environmental risks than existing technologies.
Engineers and the telecom industry readily argue that there is nothing to worry about because the high-frequency radiation of 5G will be absorbed mainly at the periphery of the body. This is based on the presumed skin characteristic that the higher the frequency of radiation, the shallower the depth of radiation penetration. In other words, most of the electromagnetic absorption (and heating) would occur over the first few millimeters of the body’s surface.
Concluding that there is no risk is forgetting that surface effects can be significant on external cells and tissues (skin, eyes for example), as well as on all blood cells which will pass the outer portion of the skin every five minutes. There are reasons to suspect that the deployment of 5G may be accompanied by an increase in the number of melanomas and other skin cancers and eye disorders. Finally, from practical tests, no such shielding effect has been demonstrated pointing to that the penetration is, after all, total.
But not only surface effects are of concern. There is also a strong suspicion that 5G radiation can have impacts far beyond the peripheral layers of the body. Living materials are not just homogeneous and inert conductive materials. It is a major mistake to omit the complexity of biological systems capable of responding to external electromagnetic stimuli otherwise than just through heating. Electromagnetic disturbances and chemical mediators (e.g. inflammatory mediators) can be spread throughout the body and induce biological (non-thermal) effects deep into the body. Such disturbances will also have an ideal avenue of spread via the peripheral nerves, the latter being found as superficial as 20-40 μm from the outer surface.
One should also remember that Professor Paolo Vecchia, head of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) at the time, at a conference at the Royal Society in London, said this in 2008 about using ICNIRP’s technical guidelines:
“What they are not: Mandatory prescriptions for safety The “last word” on the issue Defensive walls for industry or others”
(verbatim quote from voice recording)
He strongly emphasized that the ICNIRP guidelines are only technical in nature, and never were intended to be used as safety recommendations for medical issues or biological ones. As you know, around the planet, various safety codes are based on ICNIRP’s guidelines. As you also know, ICNIRP is a more or less private German organization, electing their own pro- industry members, and not allowing important scientific transparency.
Furthermore, it should be noted that only one hygienic safety value ever has been proposed: 0.0000000001-0.0000000000001 μW/m2 – this is the natural background during normal cosmic activities – proposed by myself at a trade union meeting in Stockholm, already in 1997 (i.e. one year before the publication of ICNIRP’s 1998 paper), as a genuine hygienic safety value, and since then many times repeatedly presented. (Given the highly artificial nature of the current wireless communication signals, e.g. of their pulsations and modulations, it may actually boil down to 0 (zero) μW/cm2 as the true safe level.) And do not ever believe it is possible to play it “safer” by only somewhat reducing the exposure levels! (cf. Johansson O, “To understand adverse health effects of artificial electromagnetic fields… …is “rocket science” needed or just common sense?”, In: Essays on Consciousness – Towards a New Paradigm (ed. I. Fredriksson), Balboa Press, Bloomington, IN, USA, 2018, pp 1-38, ISBN 978-1-9822-0811-0). Ironically, this means that even a Precautionary Principle – if it is not firm enough – may not prove precautionary at all. Instead, it could lead to the classical “Late lessons from early warnings” or to my quote “Too late lessons from early warnings”… (Are you prepared to risk that for a set of toys, rather than life necessities..?)
So to believe that one single 6-, 10-, or 30-minute exposure of a fluid-filled plastic doll, in an otherwise completely radiation-free environment, only calculating acute heating effects, will be any form of safety measure is more than naive. It is dangerously naive.
The big players, like the WHO, the radiation protection authorities, the telecom manufacturers, the telecom operators, the insurance and the reinsurance industry are not naive, and they have, therefore – legally – all ‘abandonedship’, some more than 20 years ago, leaving the consumers and their parliaments and governments completely behind on a ship that floats helplessly around. The big player’s decisions are far more telling than any test tube, mice, or rat experiments I can show you, and it is therefore very high time to call these big players back. They sold us this “safe” ship, and now they need to prove that it actually is. And also for the other G:s, like 2G, 3G and 4G, and the upcoming 6G and 7G.
All living beings are electrosensitive! And given the extraordinary electromagnetic sensitivity of living systems, it is not a surprise that they can be affected even at lower exposure levels, especially if the exposure is ubiquitous and prolonged. And the exposure levels, as you know, are not “low” – compared to the natural background of such frequencies the man-made ones come at colossal, astronomical, biblical levels; just the current 3G systems are allowed at a maximal exposure level of 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 times the natural background!
All around the world dramatic reductions in pollinating insect populations are noted, for instance in Germany where more than 75% of them are just gone. I am particularly concerned about this because I already have a number of papers in my files dealing with this angle. I have even recently written a short commentary based on them: Johansson O, “To bee, or not to bee, that is the five “G” question”, Newsvoice.se 28/5,
Existing wireless technologies are increasingly charged because of the major risks they pose to health and the environment. As a result, I support your concerned citizens in their demand for taking all necessary measures to halt the deployment of 5G and reduce the overall exposure levels.
I suggest you act before it is too late.
You, and your peers, have an incredible opportunity to protect the public now and work with the industry to bring biologically safe technology to market, one of the solutions would be to have shielded wired connections instead of wireless. You are part of the future, and this time in another moral-ethical realm. And remember this issue is not about natural exposures, it is about adverse health and biological effects of artificial electromagnetic fields.
Thank you for your time and consideration, please do not hesitate to contact me if I can provide additional information, complete scientific references, or presenting a lecture to you and your highly esteemed colleagues and constituents around the world. As always with the UN and the WHO this is not a local question, it is a global one, and with it comes global responsibility. That is in your hands.
For further reading, see e.g.:
Johansson O, “To understand adverse health effects of artificial electromagnetic fields… …is “rocket science” needed or just common sense?”, In: Essays on Consciousness – Towards a New Paradigm (ed. I. Fredriksson), Balboa Press, Bloomington, IN, USA, 2018b, pp 1-38, ISBN 978-1-9822-0811-0 [enclosed as a pdf]
Bandara P, Johansson O, “Comment on exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from Wi-Fi in Australian schools”, Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2018; 178: 288-291 [enclosed as a pdf]
Johansson O, “Is the ‘electrosmog’ finally clearing?”, Newsvoice.se 4/2, 2019a
Lars-Olof (LO) Landin, Johansson O, “Obefintlig etikdiskussion kring hjärnforskning och AI” (=”Non-existent ethics discussion on brain research and AI”, in Swedish), Nya Dagbladet 25/2, 2019
Johansson O, “To bee, or not to bee, that is the five “G” question”, Newsvoice.se 28/5, 2019b
Johansson O, Ferm R, ” “Yes, Prime Minister” Stefan Löfven, but no! This is not good enough!”, Newsvoice.se 3/5, 2020 https://newsvoice.se/2020/05/
Santini R, Johansson O, “If 5G is not deemed safe in the USA, and nowhere in the rest of the world, by the insurance industry … why is it by the Danish government?”, Newsvoice.se 8/7, 2020
Johansson O, Rebel TK, McGavin B, “Global 5G protest warns of health and ecological costs”, Newsvoice.se 5/9, 2020
Respectfully, Stockholm, October 24, 2020
Olle Johansson Professor, PhD Selmedalsvägen 16, 1 tr. 129 36 Hägersten Sweden +46-722-338746
ZIPPS Media interviews Prof. Olle Johansson
Please, note that Christine Zipps, at ZIPPS media, in the USA, has reviewed and posted this latest version (and deleted the former) of her recent interview with me, where we shared thoughts and reflections regarding the current and future school situation for our coming generations, the impact of the wireless systems so quickly introduced into the schools and universities, and what they may mean from a health point of view:
Health Impacts from Wireless in Schools – Olle Johansson, PhD
2) For those of you that can manage Swedish, please, listen to this podcast which – thanks to Zoia Zakariasdotter, the interviewer behind it – has that super-extra! It is such an honour to be part of her podcast “Modiga människor” (=Eng. “Brave people”)!
Here is her text about it, and the links (all in Swedish):
26 – OLLE JOHANSSON (Docent, Universitetslektor, gästprofessor, specialiserad på strålning)
Olle Johansson: Associate Professor and Senior Lecturer at Karolinska Institutet, Visiting Professor and Adjunct Professor at the Royal Institute of Technology; now retired, but continues to work intensively, i.a. he heads The Institute of Common Sense for Common Sense.
Olle has been interested in the impact of electromagnetic fields on us humans since the late 1970s. The subject is very controversial and unfortunately seems to have a divisive effect.
Despite that, Olle continues.
Olle is incredibly knowledgeable and has so many facts and knowledge.
The conversation with him is one of the most enlightening I have ever had.
On a personal level, I was positively very touched by Olle. But the meeting also made me think a lot about my own use of modern technology.
Interview with Zoia Zakariasdotter
Editing by Terno Nyman
Sound by Earthbound Mastering (Daniel Söderberg)
Jingle by Ozo Productions (Robin Fernqvist)
FAO at 75: Accelerating digital rural transformation
G20: Call to action on international standards
AI for disaster response at the edge and in pandemics
Improving disaster response at the edge and in pandemics
Sweden halts 5G auction after court allows Huawei to build 5G network
From James Devaney, Ireland
The global M2M/IoT communications market – 5th edition
North America and Western Europe ranks as the second and third largest markets for IoT solutions with 156 million and 148 million IoT subscribers respectively at the end of 2019. In contrast to China, developments in these regions are largely driven by commercial interests. The connected car is currently one of the strongest trends with more than 60 percent of new cars sold featuring embedded cellular connectivity in the regions. Fleet management, smart metering and asset monitoring comprises other key application areas for cellular IoT. Latin America, South Asia, Southeast Asia and Russia & CIS had installed bases in the range of 22–40 million IoT subscribers each, while Africa, Middle East, Central Eastern Europe, and Australia & Oceania were in the span 8–18 million.
China Mobile is the world’s largest provider of cellular IoT connectivity. At the end of 2019, the operator had an estimated 683 million cellular IoT connections and a year-on-year growth rate of 50 percent. China Unicom and China Telecom ranked second and third with 190 million and 157 million connections respectively. Vodafone ranked first among the Western operators and fourth overall with 97 million connections, followed by AT&T in fifth place with 66 million. Verizon, Deutsche Telekom and Telefónica had in the range 24–46 million cellular IoT connections. Orange and Telenor were the last players in the top ten with 17 million and 16 million connections respectively. Year-on-year growth rates for the mentioned Western operators were in the span 10–30 percent.
Our society is data-driven, enabled by near-instant, unlimited wireless connectivity
The overarching goals of 6G Flagship are
1. Support industry in finalization of 5G. Companies worldwide will need considerable support in identifying new business opportunities, obtaining maximum benefit from state of the art technology and building knowledge-based capital for the radically renewed 5G operational environment. Flagship will carry out technology and system pilots for selected verticals by co-creating with companies and ensure timely relevant wireless expertise availability for industry needs and to enable economic growth via early adaption of critical smart society technologies.
2. Develop the fundamental technology needed to enable 6G. Fund