Update January 25, 2021
Court Hearing Scheduled 2/22/2021
On February 22, 2021 we will appear in Federal Court to request a court order (1) recognizing the role of vaccines in the children’s health epidemic, (2) upholding that control group studies of vaccinated v. unvaccinated are scientifically advantageous, and (3) exempting all persons from mandatory vaccination.
Click the images below to view our court documents, proving for example that unvaccinated adults enjoy 1,248% better health than vaccinated. And unvaccinated children enjoy 1,099% better health than vaccinated.
Our Case Documents Filed December 2020
All Court Documents Filed December 2020
B. Request for Judicial Notice
- Motion for Judicial Notice, with Memorandum of Points and Authorities
- Appendix One (detailing the national health pandemic of chronic illness)
- Appendix Two (detailing that vaccines are dangerous)
- Appendix Three (detailing the foreign supply of vaccines)
- Appendix Index
- Exhibits: Volume 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- Proposed Order
C. Motion for Preliminary Injunction
- Notice of Motion
- Amended Notice of Motion
- Memorandum of Points and Authorities
- Expert Declarations: Dr. Pebsworth, Dr. Kimmel, Dr. Hulstedt, Dr. West, Dr. Hoang
- Petitioner Joy Garner Declaration
- Proposed Orders: Option One, Two, Three
Petitioner Joy Garner’s Survey Reports
A relevant article at:
Quote from the article:
Attorneys Greg Glaser and Ray Flores are taking on the vaccine industry with a new lawsuit. If successful, all Americans will have the right to exempt themselves from forced vaccination if they so choose, regardless of the reason.
While Americans are already protected under the Constitution from unsolicited invasion of bodily autonomy by the government, the suit seeks to reiterate and reestablish this in the specific context of vaccines.
On Feb. 22, Glaser and Flores will appear in Federal Court to request a court order recognizing the role that vaccines play in the children’s health epidemic and exempting all persons from mandatory vaccination. It also aims to emphasize the importance of real control group studies that compare the health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated.
Images of the court documents as filed are available at this link.
One of them shows that unvaccinated adults enjoy 1,248 percent better health than vaccinated adults. Similarly, unvaccinated children enjoy 1,099 percent better health than vaccinated children. (RELATED: This study came to similar conclusions.)
All vaccines are experimental, dangerous and not worth the risk
…the suit emphasizes the fact that vaccines simply do not live up to the claims made about them, in terms of both safety and efficacy.
A 2020 Pilot Survey Data Comparison provides numerical proof that vaccines “are causing an exponential increased risk of chronic illness in America. There is simply no denying, based on the available evidence, that unvaccinated people are orders of magnitude healthier than vaccinated people.
“Vaccines are a reasonable suspect in America’s pandemic of chronic diseases and disorders,” another section of the suit explains.
“Vaccines include legally classified neurotoxins in amounts that have never been proven safe. Vaccines are experimental because they have never followed the scientific method for testing with true placebos or a control group of entirely unvaccinated individuals.”
Another chart outlining chronic disease rates over the years depicts a sharp uptick right around the time that the government vaccine program really started to expand. The introduction of the adult vaccination schedule also brought about a precipitous increase in adult-onset chronic illness.
By definition, all vaccines are experimental because none of them have been properly safety tested, and nobody can say for sure how each individual person will react to them. All vaccine regulatory approvals are supported by:
• Fake placebos (so-called ‘placebos’ that contain neurotoxins)
• Fake controls (so-called ‘controls’ of people who are also vaccinated)
• Short-term testing windows (so-called ‘tests’ with monitoring periods as short as 3 days)
• Long-term passive surveillance of vaccine injuries (so-called “surveillance” with an unknown to approximately 99% failure rate of reporting)
“In this manner, vaccine science has not even evolved enough to recognize the basic dictionary definition of words, let alone become advanced enough to reach the status of ‘settled science,’” Glaser and Flores explain.